We've already seen in the Facebook Files on the Guardian that what US corporates consider to be 'free and protected speech' is completely anathema to what most of the rest of the world would consider to be such.
Violent threats of sexual violence are protected speech.
Nonsensical pseudo-threats against politicians, are not.
With a few exceptions, those two results would be flipped on their head outside the US. Politicians and corporations are not worthy of or deserving of automatic lese-majeste, but common people are certainly deemed so worthy. This is anathema to the interests of the users of Facebook, Twitter et al. They demand that these interests be protected by their service providers, and the influence of these interests are pervasive. That's why Twitter took so long to provide anti-harassment tools, and when they did deliver them, they were so half-baked and useless.
// @skematica @kdfrawg